Thursday, July 8, 2010

The New Range Rover





The new Range Rover's newest SUV is called Evoque and it is has very sleek but "try me or make my day" look about. I am looking forward to test driving their newest SUV when it is available in Fall 2001. I am sure that a lot of details will be coming out soon about the new Range Rover. What I do know is that it is the smallest and most fuel efficient vehicle in the line up. That is an incentive for me to think about buying this new SUV. I have always bee a bit concerned at the low MPG for the Range Rover. This would make me feel like I am not polluting as much and then my environmentally conscious friends will ride with me on my great adventures. there will be a 2 wheel drive option, work is a 4 cylinder engine is what makes this vehicle so fuel efficient. The front wheel drive will be the standard.

If I see you on the road when I am driving my Evoque next fall I will be sure to give you a toot! That is the Healing Truth!!

Personal Branding





Personal Branding for Smart People

February 18th, 2008 by Steve Pavlina Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

Personal branding is basically the way you market yourself to the world. Your personal brand is what other people think of you. In some ways it’s outside your control, but you obviously have some influence over it.

Personal branding is unavoidable. As others interact with you, they’ll automatically form mental associations that connect you with certain labels, often within the first few seconds. You can’t avoid being labeled, and other people can’t avoid labeling you. It happens automatically because our brains are wired to recognize patterns and form associations. The labels people attach to you become part of your personal brand.

If you type an email, you’re branding yourself. If you have a conversation with a friend or family member, you’re branding yourself. How you dress, what you eat, and how you talk all contribute to your brand. Think of your brand as the summation of all the associations about you that are stored in people’s minds.

A test of personal branding

This section has been edited since its original version. In the original version, I included a quick branding test, but that test is now over, and the branding resultshave been posted. Here’s what the original text said in case you’re curious:

Before we continue I’d like to ask you to do me a simple favor. It should honestly take you less than a minute. Go to my contact form, and send me a quick 3-word message. Just type 3 adjectives that you feel describe me. Maybe you’ve been reading this site for a while, or maybe this is your very first visit. It doesn’t matter. Just go with whatever pops into your head. Just type those 3 words into the message box, and send it. Don’t worry about whether your words are in order or priority or whether they sound positive or negative. Just send me any 3 words that you feel describe me as a person. You don’t need to type anything else for the message other than those three words, although you can type more if you want to. I’ll know that the 3-word messages are for this exercise.

Please take a moment to do this before you continue reading if you’re going to do it at all. Otherwise what you read next could influence your results, and I’d rather get your first impression for this before I start filling your head with other adjectives. I’ll wait… :)

After a day or two, I’ll compile the feedback and see if I can make sense of it. If so I may share the results in a future post, so we can all see what you collectively think of my personal brand and if there are some interesting general lessons we can extract.

For the purpose of this exercise, I have no control over what you might say, and I really don’t know what the most common adjectives will be. But obviously I’ve had some influence over your opinion, especially if you’re a long-term reader.

Your external brand

Your external brand is how you project yourself to the world. There is an element of choice here. You can decide what to say or write in order to convey a certain image. Your projected image will influence what others think of you and how they might choose to interact with you. You may stumble upon this image accidentally, or you can deliberately target a specific type of image.

I think the best external image to project is the one you believe best reflects who you really are. Being yourself simply means being honest.

In my view it makes little sense to pretend to be something you’re not. I don’t pretend to be a therapist with a Ph.D in psychology because that isn’t who I am. I could pick up a Ph.D from an unaccredited “degree mill” school and call myself Dr. Pavlina, but what’s the point? That mindset assumes that in order to get what I want, I must pretend to be something I’m not. But how can I get what I want if I have to disconnect from myself to get it? To me the whole notion of projecting a false image makes no sense. It can only stem from a lack of acceptance of who I am.

When people project an obviously false image at me, it only causes me to brand them in a negative way… with labels like fake, phony, insincere, disconnected, inauthentic, shallow, and so on. Those labels automatically trigger other associations like: probably wants to sell me something, going to throw up now, and where’s the fire escape?

On the other hand, I think there’s some value to projecting an image that fits who you really are. For example if you’re a very neat and organized person, but you have a scruffy beard, you’re broadcasting an incongruent message, whether you agree with it or not. This is why facial hair and salespeople don’t go well together. Many people think that if you have facial hair, you’re trying to hide something, and that isn’t good for work that requires you to build trust. Many years ago I heard about a salesperson who increased his sales just by shaving off his beard.

Paying attention to your external image needn’t become an ego trip. Really it’s just the opposite. Becoming aware of how others see you helps you identify blind spots within yourself. Then you can work on those blind spots to help you become more internally congruent. For example, our bearded salesperson may realize he (hopefully not she) was sabotaging his results because he didn’t really want to work in sales anyway.

Sometimes there are practical problems with getting your external brand and your self-image to match up. This is why I can’t dress myself. If I were truly being myself, I’d probably dress like an off-duty Star Trek character, but since I also don’t know how to shop for clothes, I still dress like it’s 1989 instead of Stardate 42523.7. But when I look deeper into this problem, I see it points me to a bigger issue — that I still need to learn to delegate. The right person, such as an image consultant, could probably fix this problem for me. So the internal-external inconsistency is really there to help point me in the direction of positive growth. Time to say goodbye to Thrilla Gorilla. :(

Your internal brand

In addition to your external brand, which is how most people think about personal branding, you also have an internal brand. This is what you think of yourself.

What 3 adjectives would you use to describe yourself? Take a moment to think about that, and jot them down. Is this a brand you feel good about? Does it really resonate with you? Is this the same image you project to the world? If you could change those adjectives, what would you change them to?

If I were to do this exercise, I’d probably pick intelligent, curious, and direct. Other words I could use to describe myself include honest, growth-oriented, happy, independent, unconventional, deep, compassionate, purposeful, ambitious, conscious, focused, disciplined, strategic, responsible, thorough, persistent, practical, funny, holistic, clever, creative, accepting, and inspired. Ask me tomorrow, and I might pick different adjectives, but these are the ones that popped into my head right now. Your choices may be totally different than mine, but this is how I think of myself at this particular time.

Now ask yourself if your internal personal brand matches the external brand you project to others. You don’t necessarily know what others think of you, but you should at least know if there are any parts of yourself you don’t fully accept which you try to hide from others. If you find some areas you’ve been hiding, consider that your lack of self-acceptance may be blinding you from seeing these aspects as the assets they really are.

For example, if you see yourself as introverted, you could see that in a negative light (shy, antisocial) or in a positive light (intelligent, deep). If you sometimes describe yourself in negative terms, see if those terms also have a positive side. Consider focusing on the positive aspects instead.

I’m colorblind, so I could certainly see that in a negative light. I could internally brand myself as limited, defective, or impaired. But instead I choose to focus on the positive aspects. I see the world differently than most people, so that gives me the opportunity to be original, insightful, and non-superficial. My colorblindness also helps me connect with people, since I always need help picking ripe fruit, and when I try to do it on my own, it often gives others a good laugh.

Brand interaction

It’s expected that your internal brand and your external brand won’t completely coincide, and that’s OK, but those incongruencies can create interesting interactions that help you grow in unexpected ways.

For example, people sometimes send me emails indicating they find me a bit quirky or strange. That’s how they see me, but it isn’t really how I see myself. However, I can understand why people see me this way because I’m really curiousabout a lot of things, I like to learn through direct experience, and I especially enjoy creative undertakings. So while I don’t try to be intentionally quirky, I must admit that is a side effect of my general approach to life. By understanding that this is how others see me, however, I can acknowledge it up front, such as by poking fun at myself for undertaking yet another strange experiment, even though it doesn’t seem that way to me. When I do something strange and don’t acknowledge the strangeness, people can feel disconnected from me, but when I show that I’m aware of their perceptions, it keeps us connected.

Once you’ve gotten yourself assigned a few adjectives in someone else’s mind, it can be very difficult to change that. So just make the best of the adjectives you’ve been assigned. When you learn how others see you, you can “play back at them” by acknowledging their expectations. Instead of trying to fight your own branding, roll with it and turn it into a strength. This actually helps you reconnect your external brand with your internal one.

If I see myself as curious, while others see me as quirky, I can accept the quirkiness label and run with it. I can see how quirkiness still aligns with my internal brand. Quirkiness connects well with being creative and unconventional. It can also fit with intelligence because some people associate quirkiness with genius. Geniuses are strange people with odd personality quirks, right? By acknowledging and accepting what other people think of me, I can help to bring that projected image into better alignment with my own self-image. This helps other people connect with me as I am instead of connecting with a false projection of who they think I am.

This morning I did some spontaneous personal brand testing my family. Erin brands me as “insightful, courageous, and passionate.” My 7-year-old daughter, Emily, describes me as “tough, big, and strong.” I told her I brand her as “cute, creative, and sneaky.” Erin brands Emily as “funny, mischievous, and caring.” Emily described her 4-year-old brother as “little, clean, and bumpy.” Everyone is right because these brands all exist in their minds.

Personal branding has a lot to teach us about personal growth. It’s a rich place to explore. I encourage you to try the earlier exercise with your friends, family, and coworkers. Ask everyone to describe you with 3 adjectives. You’ll learn a great deal from it.

Incidentally, the Stardate I mentioned earlier (Are you geek enough to have already Googled it? Or worse… recognized it from memory?) is from an episode that really brings home the importance of personal branding. If you aren’t a Trekkie and have no idea what I’m talking about, well… methinks you’ve got bigger problems than personal branding. ;)

If I ever get bored of the tagline “Personal Development for Smart People,” I think I’ll go with “Tough, Big, and Strong.” :)

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

100 Ways to Measure Social Media





100 Ways to Measure Social Media

Social media marketing continues to be a hot topic, as does the question of how to measure it. Like other engagement efforts, it’s important to determine the effectiveness of your initiatives.

David Berkowitz, Senior Director of Emerging Media and Innovation for agency 360i, compiled a great list of 100 ways to measure social media. While this list seems overwhelming at first, Berkowitz says, “Some entries here can be interpreted several ways. Depending on how you define them, some of these metrics may seem redundant, while others may seem so broad that they can be broken out further. Many of these can be combined with each other to create new metrics that can then be tracked over time.”



Read more: http://www.pamorama.net/2010/04/05/100-ways-to-measure-social-media/#ixzz0t1NqyqVVHere’s the list, followed by the slides Berkowitz created from the list for the Promotion Marketing Association’s Blur event in Chicago where he gave a talk in their digital track about metrics.

1. Volume of consumer-created buzz for a brand based on number of posts

2. Amount of buzz based on number of impressions

3. Shift in buzz over time

4. Buzz by time of day/daypart

5. Seasonality of buzz

6. Competitive buzz

7. Buzz by category/topic

8. Buzz by social channel (forums, social networks, blogs, Twitter, etc.)

9. Buzz by stage in purchase funnel (e.g., researching vs. completing transaction vs. post-purchase)

10. Asset popularity (e.g., if several videos are available to embed, which is used more)

11. Mainstream media mentions

12. Fans

13. Followers

14. Friends

15. Growth rate of fans, followers, and friends

16. Rate of virality/pass-along

17. Change in virality rates over time

18. Second-degree reach (connections to fans, followers, and friends exposed – by people or impressions)

19. Embeds/Installs

20. Downloads

21. Uploads

22. User-initiated views (e.g., for videos)

23. Ratio of embeds or favoriting to views

24. Likes/favorites

25. Comments

26. Ratings

27. Social bookmarks

28. Subscriptions (RSS, podcasts, video series)

29. Pageviews (for blogs, microsites, etc)

30. Effective CPM based on spend per impressions received

31. Change in search engine rankings for the site linked to through social media

32. Change in search engine share of voice for all social sites promoting the brand

33. Increase in searches due to social activity

34. Percentage of buzz containing links

35. Links ranked by influence of publishers

36. Percentage of buzz containing multimedia (images, video, audio)

37. Share of voice on social sites when running earned and paid media in same environment

38. Influence of consumers reached

39. Influence of publishers reached (e.g., blogs)

40. Influence of brands participating in social channels

41. Demographics of target audience engaged with social channels

42. Demographics of audience reached through social media

43. Social media habits/interests of target audience

44. Geography of participating consumers

45. Sentiment by volume of posts

46. Sentiment by volume of impressions

47. Shift in sentiment before, during, and after social marketing programs

48. Languages spoken by participating consumers

49. Time spent with distributed content

50. Time spent on site through social media referrals

51. Method of content discovery (search, pass-along, discovery engines, etc)

52. Clicks

53. Percentage of traffic generated from earned media

54. View-throughs

55. Number of interactions

56. Interaction/engagement rate

57. Frequency of social interactions per consumer

58. Percentage of videos viewed

59. Polls taken/votes received

60. Brand association

61. Purchase consideration

62. Number of user-generated submissions received

63. Exposures of virtual gifts

64. Number of virtual gifts given

65. Relative popularity of content

66. Tags added

67. Attributes of tags (e.g., how well they match the brand’s perception of itself)

68. Registrations from third-party social logins (e.g., Facebook Connect, Twitter OAuth)

69. Registrations by channel (e.g., Web, desktop application, mobile application, SMS, etc)

70. Contest entries

71. Number of chat room participants

72. Wiki contributors

73. Impact of offline marketing/events on social marketing programs or buzz

74. User-generated content created that can be used by the marketer in other channels

75. Customers assisted

76. Savings per customer assisted through direct social media interactions compared to other channels (e.g., call centers, in-store)

77. Savings generated by enabling customers to connect with each other

78. Impact on first contact resolution (FCR) (hat tip to Forrester Research for that one)

79. Customer satisfaction

80. Volume of customer feedback generated

81. Research & development time saved based on feedback from social media

82. Suggestions implemented from social feedback

83. Costs saved from not spending on traditional research

84. Impact on online sales

85. Impact on offline sales

86. Discount redemption rate

87. Impact on other offline behavior (e.g., TV tune-in)

88. Leads generated

89. Products sampled

90. Visits to store locator pages

91. Conversion change due to user ratings, reviews

92. Rate of customer/visitor retention

93. Impact on customer lifetime value

94. Customer acquisition/retention costs through social media

95. Change in market share

96. Earned media’s impact on results from paid media

97. Responses to socially posted events

98. Attendance generated at in-person events

99. Employees reached (for internal programs)

100. Job applications received



Read more: http://www.pamorama.net/2010/04/05/100-ways-to-measure-social-media/#ixzz0t1NllsME

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Five Things To Do In DC - Chicago Tribune article





Five things to do in Washington, D.C., beyond the obvious

12:00 AM CDT on Sunday, July 4, 2010
By JOSH NOEL Chicago Tribune Josh Noel, Chicago Tribune
WASHINGTON, D.C. – You already know the museums, the monuments and the mall. Here are five things to do next time you visit D.C. that will offer a new perspective.

1Adams Morgan – This neighborhood in central D.C., just a couple of miles north of the National Mall, is abuzz with international flavor. Whether you want French, Himalayan, Latin or Ethiopian food, it's here.

Contact: www.adamsmorgannow.com

2National Museum of Health and Medicine – Established during the Civil War as a museum for "specimens of morbid anatomy ... together with projectiles and foreign bodies removed," today's collection includes the bullet that killed Abraham Lincoln . At the district's northern end, at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, it is far from the usual roster of sights.

Contact: www.nmhm.washingtondc.museum

3 National Museum of the American Indian cafeteria – With a mind-bending menu that spans the lower 48 – because what Plains Indians ate and eat is different from what Indians of the Northwest ate and eat – it's as much a cultural journey as any exhibit.

Contact: www.nmai.si.edu


4 Mount Vernon Trail – On this lovely, looping ride, you will pedal your bike past Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (watch the planes land), Alexandria (walk the historic streets and grab a bite to eat) and wind up at Mount Vernon (see where the first president lived). Just save energy to pedal back.

Contact: www.nps.gov/gwmp



5Rock Creek Park – One of the nation's largest urban parks and a gem. Options include hiking and biking, a planetarium, ranger-led programs and golf. In much of Rock Creek, especially patches along the river or at the bottom of a plunging ravine, you would have no idea you are in a major metropolitan center, let alone a few miles from the White House.

Contact: www.nps.gov/rocr/index.htm

Josh Noel,

Chicago Tribune

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Obama's Still a Possibility at Chelsea Clinton Wedding


Obama's Still a Possibility at Chelsea Clinton Wedding

According to a knowledgeable source with ties to the Clinton's and Obama's there has been no final decision on whether the President and First Lady, Barack and Michelle Obama will be at the marriage ceremony or reception of the upcoming Chelsea Clinton wedding

(PRWEB) July 1, 2010 -- According to a knowledgeable source with ties to the Clinton’s and Obama’s there has been no final decision on whether the President and First Lady, Barack and Michelle Obama will be at the marriage ceremony or reception of the upcoming Chelsea Clinton wedding (http://www.chelseaclintonweddingwatch.com/). According to this source, while the public is being led to believe that it won’t happen, security plans are still being developed for such a possibility.

What would it mean for the wedding, for history and for both the Obama’s and Clinton’s? Would the appearance of the Obama’s, even at the reception, upstage a private, family affair? Or would it add prestige and honor?

In 1897, Frances “Fanny” Hayes, daughter of former president Rutherford B. Hayes, was married in Ohio. The newly elected president, William McKinley, and the entire cabinet made the pilgrimage, McKinley taking the presidential train, the Air Force One of its day. Did it overpower the Hayes wedding? After all, the nation was fascinated with its new president who had been in office only days. No, by all accounts, Fanny Hayes and her husband, Ensign Harry Eaton Smith, captured the day’s headlines. The public had been following Fanny since her adolescent years in her father’s White House. All of the distinguished guests only ensured that the event would be set in stone as one of the greatest social events in our short national history.

According to some recent polls, the Clintons are now more popular than the Obamas. So it is not likely that any guest, including the president and first lady, would upstage her marriage to longtime, 31-year-old, boyfriend and Goldman Sachs banker, Marc Mezvinsky.

News about the wedding has been a story in itself, with speculation that the public, media savvy Clinton's have purposely dropped disinformation to help shroud the event in privacy. Hints about the wedding last summer embarrassed news agencies when it didn’t happen. It is now set for July 31, 2010. Published accounts were also wrong about the dress. It will be a Vera Wang creation, not Oscar de la Renta as widely reported. And the location will not be at Martha's Vineyard but deep on the grounds of a Clinton supporter a few hours north of New York City.

All of these efforts may not be enough to sufficiently dampen public interest. The Jenna Bush wedding took place during a low ebb in the popularity of President Bush and at a time when the war on terror counseled as little publicity as possible. Jenna was married at the Bush family, Prairie Chapel Ranch in Crawford, Texas, a rather remote location. But the Clinton wedding (http://www.chelseaclintonweddingwatch.com/) will be within driving distance of the media capital of the world. And at a time when the Clinton presidency is being viewed more favorably in comparison to his two successors.

Weddings of presidential children, no matter how carefully planned and private they wish them to be, can prompt unexpected public reactions. When the president’s son, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr. married Ethel DuPont on June 30, 1937, the couple had every expectation that their wedding would be a private, quiet affair. The ceremony took place deep in the DuPont family compound in Delaware, far from any public highway. But on the wedding day, several hundred thousand uninvited people lined the roads to wish the couple well. Three companies of soldiers were brought in to escort the president’s family. And the Army Corps of Engineers was asked to set up a makeshift kitchen.

It is exactly such moments in presidential history that have made the modern presidency more savvy and less likely to be ambushed by either the media or the public. And it partially accounts for the Clinton sleight of hand on the details leading up to the event.

Still, this is a polarizing presidential family, whose star is now more clearly visible in the historic firmament. With the Clinton's we experienced a roller coaster of emotions in public life. Some pundits predicted that it would be hard for Chelsea Clinton to ever trust a man or ever get married. So this wedding ceremony is a milestone that marks a marriage that has endured, a presidency that grows fonder by absence and a child who landed on her feet in spite of the odds. The media and public may demand to know more and celebrate it with more fanfare than Chelsea, the so called Garbo of presidential children, would like. With or without the Obama's it will be a moment in history.

Press Release by Doug Wead, New York Times Bestselling author of "All the Presidents' Children", Presidential Historian and frequent guest of Fox News, CNBC, CBS, NBC and CNN. See his Chelsea Clinton Wedding Watch site for breaking news: http://www.ChelseaClintonWeddingWatch.com/

# # #


Contact Information
Doug Wead
http://www.dougwead.com/
206-202-8023

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Olympus Pen Camera - The Picture Perfect Pick!


I have read a lot of articles and reviews on the new Olympus Pen Camera and I want one. Trying to find out how they can send me one an let me blog all about it to other novice photographers like myself. I think this will be my next BFF if I can get my hands on one. Check it out for yourself and I would love to know your thoughts too!


http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/product.asp?product=1461

NOT A POINT AND SHOOT. NOT AN SLR.
IT'S A PEN. WHAT WILL YOU CREATE?

Major new PEN firmware update available now!
> Click here to learn more.

The Olympus E-P1 marks an innovative new era in digital imaging. Our new Micro Four Thirds camera upholds the legacy of the celebrated PEN family of cameras, with the photographic optics of an SLR and the size and simplicity of a point and shoot. Combining the still image quality of a digital single lens reflex (DSLR) with the A/V quality of both a High Definition camcorder and high-end audio recorder, the E-P1 is a virtual full-service imaging studio in one ultra-portable and stylishly retro body. With dozens of advanced features, the E-P1 makes documenting and sharing your everyday life easier and more creative than ever before.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

STEDMAN WANTS BETTER TREATMENT FOR OPRAH

STEDMAN WANTS BETTER TREATMENT FOR OPRAH



THE FACTSOprah & Stedman

Oprah’s longtime boyfriend shared his thoughts on the treatment Oprah receives from Chicago residents.

THE SPIN
I haven’t heard the name Stedman Graham in a long time, but he’s got something to say, ya’ll, and it pertains to the reason why most of us know his name.

In an interview with WFLD-Channel 32 news, Graham said he doesn’t appreciate how unappreciative Chicago folks are of Oprah.

He said:

“I really don’t think they appreciate her. I don’t think they understand the value of who she is as a human being and what she’s done. I’m just saying from an insider’s point of view that I don’t think she gets her just due based on who she really is and what she’s done for the Chicagoland area. It’s home for her, and it’s just natural for people to kind of take her for granted — until you leave.”

Graham also added, “A prophet has no honor in its own town.”

Well if they don’t love her enough now perhaps they will in a year or two’s time as Oprah makes her way to La La land to move forward with her new cable network.

Will Stedman be joining her? “I probably will be moving in that direction,” he said though he made sure to note the focus of his business will remain in the Chi.

Oh and get this, the interviewer asked if she could call him “Mr. Oprah Winfrey.”

Why do some journalists purposely say slick stuff they know will piss a person off?

Do better.

Search This Blog